Revision as of 18:21, 23 March 2012 view source Tryptofish (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 71,723 edits →Position #3: view by Tryptofish ← Previous edit		Revision as of 20:43, 23 March 2012 view source Wehwalt (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Administrators 155,535 edits →Position #3 Next edit →
Line 8: <!-- PLEASE ADD A HASH SIGN (#) BEFORE YOUR ENDORSEMENT. USE THE DISCUSSION SECTION TO REPLY TO COMMENTS IN OTHER USERS' ENDORSEMENTS. PLEASE DO NOT ADD ALTERNATE PROPOSALS --> # I would like the draft policy to address: (1) the responsibilities of reviewers, more clearly, (2) the status of users who were previously given the reviewer right, and (3) the kinds of development improvements that will be requested of the developers. --[[User:Tryptofish\|Tryptofish]] ([[User talk:Tryptofish\|talk]]) 18:21, 23 March 2012 (UTC) #I agree with Tryptofish. I have not minded giving out a useless reviewer right. Now it is about to become meaningful. The policy should address this.--[[User:Wehwalt\|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt\|talk]]) 20:43, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2012/Option 3: Difference between revisions