Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2012/Option 1: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
HairyWombat (talk | contribs) →Position #1: Support |
→Position #1: +1 |
||
Line 9:
#That's pretty much it. I get the idea and all, but it just didn't work out. <font color="#FFB911">'''[[User:Rcsprinter123|<span style="font-family:cambria; font-size:10pt; color:gray">Rcsprinter</span>]]''' [[User talk:Rcsprinter123|<span style="font-family:calibri; font-size:8pt; color:black">(orate)</span>]]</font> 20:27, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
#Will be glad to see the back of it. [[User:HairyWombat|HairyWombat]] 20:34, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
#Use of pending changes over a significant fraction of our articles would contradict fundamental principles and create huge mountains of work. I was supportive of the alternative idea of using pending changes as a form of protection, but I don't think the benefits outweighed the drawbacks. Protected pages are by definition subject to abuse, most suggested edits to pages under PC were not constructive, and the edits which were useful did not justify the expense of editor effort to weed out the problematic edits. At the same time there is certainly the potential for abuse in the manner described by SoWhy. I don't think use of the tool can be justified except possibly in a handful of special cases. '''''<font color="#FF0000">[[User:Hut 8.5|Hut 8.5]]</font>''''' 20:43, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
<!-- PLEASE ADD A HASH SIGN (#) BEFORE YOUR ENDORSEMENT. USE THE DISCUSSION SECTION TO REPLY TO COMMENTS IN OTHER USERS' ENDORSEMENTS. PLEASE DO NOT ADD ALTERNATE PROPOSALS -->
|