Revision as of 11:06, 24 March 2012 edit Allens (talk \| contribs) Rollbackers 36,086 edits →Discussion: Checking if I'm understanding something correctly ← Previous edit		Revision as of 12:01, 24 March 2012 edit undo CBM (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 55,390 edits →Arguments against Position #2: c Next edit →
Line 17: :Have you read the metrics that have been collected? For example, did you know that PC permitted us to benefit from more than 200 good edits from unregistered users per day during the initial trial, all of which happened on articles that had previously been semi-protected? [[User:WhatamIdoing\|WhatamIdoing]] ([[User talk:WhatamIdoing\|talk]]) 23:50, 23 March 2012 (UTC) ::Out of how many edits? I have seen the metrics, and they suggest those 200 edits are less than 50% of all edits caught behind the review filter. Compared to ''unprotection'' (the metric that should be used) that isn't a better situation. —<font color="228B22">[[User:Jéské Couriano\|''Jeremy'']] [[User talk:Jéské Couriano\|v^_^v]]</font> <sup><small>[[Special:Contributions/Jéské Couriano\|Bori!]]</small></sup> 03:33, 24 March 2012 (UTC) *:::You're comparing apples and oranges. The proposal is to change from semiprotection to PC, not from unprotected to PC. If your idea is to remove the semiprotection from all the articles that it is on, and replace it with nothing, that would be a separate proposal. PC is only used for articles that would otherwise be semiprotected or fully protected, and it gives an improvement over those forms of protection. — Carl <small>([[User:CBM\|CBM]] · [[User talk:CBM\|talk]])</small> 12:01, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2012/Discussion: Difference between revisions