Revision as of 20:59, 24 March 2012 edit CBM (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 55,390 edits →Arguments against Position #2: out ← Previous edit		Revision as of 21:05, 24 March 2012 edit undo Jéské Couriano (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers 42,084 edits →Arguments against Position #2: Re Next edit →
Line 24: ::::::I see no false dichotomy in my statement, and your drug metaphor is crap because it assumes a position of complete safety (being clean). My argument here is based on anonymous and newly-registered users being able to edit, as opposed to vandalism (where only full-protection grants complete safety). Thus, semi-protection is a poor metric because it prevents that (and even fails your drug metaphor because it's still relatively ineffective at stopping vandalism). —<font color="228B22">[[User:Jéské Couriano\|''Jeremy'']] [[User talk:Jéské Couriano\|v^_^v]]</font> <sup><small>[[Special:Contributions/Jéské Couriano\|Bori!]]</small></sup> 20:54, 24 March 2012 (UTC) :::::I'm getting an IDIDNTHEARTHAT vibe here, so I'm out. — Carl <small>([[User:CBM\|CBM]] · [[User talk:CBM\|talk]])</small> 20:59, 24 March 2012 (UTC) *::::::I heard everything you said. I'm disputing your metrics because they compare a nonzero value against zero, as opposed to two nonzero values. —<font color="228B22">[[User:Jéské Couriano\|''Jeremy'']] [[User talk:Jéské Couriano\|v^_^v]]</font> <sup><small>[[Special:Contributions/Jéské Couriano\|Bori!]]</small></sup> 21:05, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2012/Discussion: Difference between revisions