Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2012/Discussion: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Arguments against Position #2: pot and kettle |
|||
Line 28:
*"It also will help against self-promoters, allowing established editors in good standing to contribute and sockpuppetters to be blocked." Unless you can apply PC to redlinks, the first is effectively impossible and the second is already done by semi-protection (as most sockpuppetteers make socks '''specifically to cheat it''', making them all the more obvious). Aside from putting all anon/new user edits through a bozo filter (which {{tl|editrequest}} does equally as well) what does PC do that semiprotection cannot? —<font color="228B22">[[User:Jéské Couriano|''Jeremy'']] [[User talk:Jéské Couriano|v^_^v]]</font> <sup><small>[[Special:Contributions/Jéské Couriano|Bori!]]</small></sup> 21:12, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
::Editrequest plainly doesn't do it equally well. If you want to just fix a typo, it's non-intuitive and a hassle, and you are not likely to bother. At least, I wouldn't. [[User:FormerIP|FormerIP]] ([[User talk:FormerIP|talk]]) 22:25, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
:::And PC has much the same flaws. Why try to fix a typo if the change isn't live immediately? That hurts the encyclopedia. —<font color="228B22">[[User:Jéské Couriano|''Jeremy'']] [[User talk:Jéské Couriano|v^_^v]]</font> <sup><small>[[Special:Contributions/Jéské Couriano|Bori!]]</small></sup> 06:27, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
|