Revision as of 10:41, 25 March 2012 view source G(x) (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 616 edits →Position #1 ← Previous edit		Revision as of 11:26, 25 March 2012 view source Michig (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Administrators 70,074 edits →Position #1: + Next edit →
Line 21: #Pending changes has a cumbersome interface, is confusing to use and unnecessarily complex to administer, has the potential to drive away clueful editors, and fails utterly to address the most serious content problems we are facing. More troubling, we are again putting the cart before the horse by considering resurrecting PC in the absence of any credible evidence that it is needed. Effective tools to combat persistent vandalism, BLP violations, and other unconstructive edits already exist, and they work well; other options have been identified but not actively considered. Unless it can be demonstrated that there is a serious, intractable problem that pending changes is uniquely capable of solving, let's not go down this road again. [[User:Rivertorch\|Rivertorch]] ([[User talk:Rivertorch\|talk]]) 07:26, 25 March 2012 (UTC) # Pending changes will make Wikipedia controlled by only some individuals in certain pages, which is entirely different from the main principle of the free encyclopedia. I am also in favor of comment number 1, 4, 5, 8 and 11. --[[User:G(x)\|G(x)]] ([[User talk:G(x)\|talk]]) 10:41, 25 March 2012 (UTC) #--[[User:Michig\|Michig]] ([[User talk:Michig\|talk]]) 11:26, 25 March 2012 (UTC) <!-- PLEASE ADD A HASH SIGN (#) BEFORE YOUR ENDORSEMENT. USE THE DISCUSSION SECTION TO REPLY TO COMMENTS IN OTHER USERS' ENDORSEMENTS. PLEASE DO NOT ADD ALTERNATE PROPOSALS -->

Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2012/Option 1: Difference between revisions