Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Http file server: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 00:00, 14 April 2006

Revision as of 08:36, 14 April 2006

Line 4:

'''Rawbanana's reply'''

I'm not affiliated with this software in any way. However, I feel that it is a relatively unknownunique and yet revolutionary software andthat deserves to be recognized in Wikipedia. Please also understand that this is my first article and I do not really understand how to edit articles properly or format it properly for Wikipedia.

I edited my original submission thinking that it had added enough to justify entry into Wikipedia. If that is not enough and you still feel this article is not worthy, please delete it. In the meantime, I will try to learn more about the Wikipedia system and see if I can fulfill the Wikipedia requirements.

Note the information I have used in the article is primarily from the forums http://www.rejetto.com/forum/index.php?c=6 or from Sourceforge.net. AsI forhave notability,tried thereto isbe anneutral articleas aboutmuch itas inpossible. ItalianAgain I think...didn't http://punto-informatico.it/download/scheda.asp?i=795realize andnew itentries wonwere 2004so www.snapfiles.comhard veryto goodbe softwareapproved award.for AccordingWikipedia toand aI forumwill poster,try itto wasread alsoup "discoveredon itwhat thoughthis Hak.5submission episodeis 9"missing. althoughShould I can'thave findleft athe link<nowiki>{{prod}}</nowiki> specificallyfor someone else to remove? Oh well...

I have tried to be neutral as much as possible. Again I didn't realize new entries were so hard to be approved for Wikipedia and I will try to read up on what this submission is missing. Should I have left the <nowiki>{{prod}}</nowiki> for someone else to remove? Oh well...

:You may remove <nowiki>{{prod}}</nowiki> tags from articles you create, but if you do so you should put something on the talk page justifying why you think it should be included, similar to what you wrote above. Please read over the guidelines at [[WP:SOFTWARE]], and also [[WP:NOR]]. In short as an encyclopedia, Wikipedia should not be used to promote "relatively unknown" products, persons, or ideas. It should be used to document things that are already notable in their own right. [[User:NTK|NTK]] 20:03, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

* '''Delete''' looking at the article a stable full-featured version was only released last month, which I guess explains why there is no evidence of market share, innovation, iomportance, influence, non-trivial coverage in reliable secondary sources etc. Which means we can't verify the neutrality of the article. [[WP:SOFTWARE]] appears to apply. [[User Talk:JzG|Just zis <span style="border: 1px; border-style:solid; padding:0px 2px 2px 2px; color:white; background-color:darkblue; font-weight:bold">Guy</span> you know?]] 21:03, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

*'''Delete'''. Unknown anything is not notable. [[User talk:RasputinAXP|<font color="#FFFFFF" style="background: maroon;">&nbsp;RasputinAXP&nbsp;</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/RasputinAXP|<small>c</small>]] [[Image:Gadsden flag large.png|25px]] 00:00, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

* As for notability, I've edited the submission to include its recent appearance in Hak.5 to illustrate how HFS is often used by PSP users to download/upload files.