Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2012/Option 1: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Line 33:
# No, no and no. This has been resurrected and buried a couple of times now. Why will nobody let this corpse rest in its grave? The only thing to come of this is arguments, more arguments, and [[WP:DRAMA|Wikidrama]]. It's dead, for god's sake leave it that way. <span style="border: 1px solid red;">[[User_talk:BarkingFish|<font style="background:white;" color="purple">&nbsp;'''BarkingFish'''&nbsp;</font>]]</span> 21:22, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
# Although as a community we have dealt with vandalism and content disputes in the past, if there are serious flaws with an editors who are interested in an article who watch it can always revert it and begin a discussion if necessary. One of the virtues and responsibilities of Wikipedia is that ANYONE can edit an article (and we are to have good faith that for the most part that anyone will be editing in a positive manor that keeps with the [[WP:5P|pillars]] that guide our community), and with such freedom others can also alter those edits if they are deemed to not be keeping with guidelines and policies that have consensus by our community. Granted this means that involved knowledgeable editors need to patrol for vandalism or content they believe do not meet [[WP:V]] or [[WP:NPOV]] or something else (like [[WP:BLP]]), but that is the responsibility that keeps with the freedom of openness that makes Wikipedia so accessible. --[[User:RightCowLeftCoast|RightCowLeftCoast]] ([[User talk:RightCowLeftCoast|talk]]) 00:56, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
# My views are summed up by many of the previous posters here. [[User:Dalliance|Dalliance]] ([[User talk:Dalliance|talk]]) 12:03, 26 March 2012 (UTC)