Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2012/Option 1: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Position #1: oppose |
|||
Line 36:
# Unnecessary complexity creep. [[User:TotientDragooned|TotientDragooned]] ([[User talk:TotientDragooned|talk]]) 14:28, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
# Honestly I find myself surprised I'm taking this position, but I feel I should '''oppose''' PC. I am concerned that this results in a more hierarchical system with more power to administrators. The draft policy requires reviewer status to have similar requirements to rollback, but I am concerned that a sort of RfA attitude could drift into PC which would have disastrous and [[WP:CABAL|cabal]]-like results. PC protection is different from the existing semi-protect because AFAIK confirmed is an automatically granted permission; not one that requires beseeching one of our administrative overlords to allow you into the cool kids club. [[User:OSborn|OSborn]]<sup> [[User_talk:OSborn|arf]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/OSborn|contribs.]]</sub> 15:17, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
# PC level 1 proved to be a spectactular failure: added complexity, reduced performance, conflicting views as to what editors should look for, and generally less usable than our current system. PC level 2, while underused previously, appeared to have actual merit and value. I would support a move to add PC 2 to our toolset, but oppose PC 1.—[[User:Kww|Kww]]([[User talk:Kww|talk]]) 19:27, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
| |||