|
==comment==
~~Someone has vandalized this page. I tried to revert it back to an earlier version, but unfortunately I don't know how. Can someone please revert it? I came here to learn more about ASP.net and found that someone has inserted his name all throughout the article. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/24.3.221.226|24.3.221.226]] ([[User talk:24.3.221.226|talk]]) 05:44, 18 September 2008 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
==asp.net==
is ASP.net a compiled language?
:Yes --[[User:WayneMokane|WayneMokane]] 07:47, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)
:Yes and No. ASP.NET must be compiled by the server (aka IIS) to a .NET common language runtime, from which it will be interpreted by the server machine. But you don´t need to compile an ASP.NET file to run it on the server, the server does it for you. In this case, the answer is No. --[[User:Cedric.graebin|Cedric.graebin]] 23:42, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
:To expand on that, the assembly that is created from your pages is indeed compiled to MSIL, however, the JIT then kicks in during runtime and the corresponding machine code is cached and used on the next invocation.
:NO -- The ASP.NET Portion is not compiled, but interpreted by the IIS web server. The parts that are compiled are written in a compilable language such as C# or VB.NET. These parts of the application are compiled on the server.
:: I beg to differ. Check your %WINDIR%\Microsoft.NET\Framework\%DOT_NET_VERSION%\Temporary ASP.NET Files folder. You'll see the end-result of the "ASP.NET Portion" translated to code (C# in may case) as well as the DLL that was generated. The end result is a compiled page, even if you don't do code-behind. - [[User:Nuggetboy|Chris]] 00:00, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
:First, ASP.NET is not a language. Second, YES, all parts that made up an ASP.NET application are compiled, including plain-text .aspx files (they are compiled as the first request come into a .NET assembly ("dll") which is stored somewhere in a temporary folder). <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[User:62.168.95.194|62.168.95.194]] ([[User talk:62.168.95.194|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/62.168.95.194|contribs]]) {{{2|}}}.</small><!-- [Template:Unsigned] -->
This "article" is absolutely pure Microsoft marketing hype. Where is the balance that an encyclopedia is supposed to bring to a subject? I suspect the person who wrote it makes their living promoting Microsoft products. Microsoft is well know for “planting” people and marketing articles like this on the web.
:I completely agree. I just entered the discussion page to see if im the only one feeling "uncomfortable" with this article- esp. the "common misconceptions" section... unfortunately i dont know the subject material enough to validate. plz if someone feels the same, maybe a neutrality warning is in place here... <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/88.152.170.12|88.152.170.12]] ([[User talk:88.152.170.12|talk]]) 21:19, August 26, 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Would asking for full disclosure about the author be asking too much?
[[User:70.162.248.198|70.162.248.198]] 02:40, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
JustBoo
== Minimo? ==
:Just a hunch, but could "Minimo" be a Microsoft trademark for servers it sells, and the statement intended to say "alternatives to Minimo"? [[User:Unfree|Unfree]] ([[User talk:Unfree|talk]]) 16:05, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
| 