Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A.A.N.M&V.V.R.S.R POLYTECHNIC: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→A.A.N.M&V.V.R.S.R POLYTECHNIC: comment |
|||
Line 8:
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/India|list of India-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>[[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 15:04, 30 March 2012 (UTC)</small>
*'''Keep''' - We keep tertiary instituions for the very good reason that experience shows that, with enough research, sources can invariably be found that meet [[WP:ORG]]. Google is a very poor tool for finding sources on Indian colleges because, unlike US colleges, they don't dump everything on the Internet. Indeed, very few have much of an Internet presence at all. We must avoid systemic bias and allow time for local sources to be researched since no evidence has been adduced that this polytechnic cannot meet notability requirements. [[User:TerriersFan|TerriersFan]] ([[User talk:TerriersFan|talk]]) 16:44, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
::Sadly for this particular college, I only found ''one'' non-Wikipedia hit on Google, and surprise, it is a Facebook page. I would also like to point out a quote I found on the article guidelines about schools. (Yes it is not a policy, but nevertheless it should [usually] be followed).
{{quotation|It is recommended that editors only create a school article when its content shows that it already passes the notability guideline '''by displaying significant coverage in reliable sources.'''}}.
::I did find more hits with "AANM&VVRSR", but sadly they were not reliable sources. I do hope someone finds sources though. [[User:Narutolovehinata5|Narutolovehinata5]] <sup>[[User talk:Narutolovehinata5|t]][[Special:Contributions/Narutolovehinata5|c]][[WP:CSD|csd]][[Special:Newpages|new]]</sup> 01:45, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
|