Revision as of 14:04, 30 March 2012 edit Just plain Bill (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 25,465 edits →Looking for feedback, more additions to come: 1 more ← Previous edit		Revision as of 20:46, 4 April 2012 edit undo 76.172.73.97 (talk) →Use more varied or general examples: (actually refers to the top section not this one) MISSPELLING Next edit →
Line 9: What is the relationship between this entry and the gestalt theory? They seem to cover much of the same ground. http://daphne.palomar.edu/design/gestalt.html and then this [http://web.archive.org/web/20030212105018/http://www.ivla.org/news/rdocs/vlbib/vbl4.htm#b bibliography] under perception. [[User:Rabourn\|Rabourn]] ([[User talk:Rabourn\|talk]]) 07:41, 18 May 2009 (UTC) [[Special:Contributions/76.172.73.97\|76.172.73.97]] ([[User talk:76.172.73.97\|talk]]) 20:46, 4 April 2012 (UTC)OD-LA: even if I were signed in I cant affect the top section, the one above this section. I do believe there is a misspelling in this sentence: " The principles of design is what is bing done to the elements of design how they come together to create a design." == Do not merge ==

Talk:Visual design elements and principles: Difference between revisions