Revision as of 08:12, 16 April 2012 edit 125.17.120.126 (talk) →The article is an ad for the software, it needs to be rewritten ← Previous edit		Revision as of 08:13, 16 April 2012 edit undo 125.17.120.126 (talk) →The article is an ad for the software, it needs to be rewritten Next edit →
Line 8: Good concise description of CSLA. We've been successfully using CSLA (it is open source and free) as the middleware for our WPF applications for years. The article could be improved by describing more thoroughly how CSLA can be deployed through a data portal (or not).[[User:Greggdourgarian\|Greggdourgarian]] ([[User talk:Greggdourgarian\|talk]]) 10:43, 28 September 2010 (UTC) The descriptions are very poor for a newcomer to understand although exciting. Yeah appears like an advertisement but can be corrected to make it more insighful into solution that CSLA provides. [[User:Venkyzealous\|Venkyzealous]]

Talk:Component-based Scalable Logical Architecture: Difference between revisions