Content deleted Content added
Storm Rider (talk | contribs) →This article is way too long: I will reverrt change; Novel, please read. |
|||
Line 217:
::That is not a reaction or a request that I can argue with; it is the standard procedure. Novel, I am reverting your changes. Please go to each section and make the changes you propose. Give reasoning for your changes in the subject line; when you think there is going to be some question, explain yourself on this page. It takes a little longer, but the result is that everyone is on board at the same time. Thanks. [[User:Storm Rider|Storm Rider]] [[User talk:Storm Rider|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 00:55, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
:::I said: "Should I have issued my change in the form of dozens of changes section-by section as StormRider was doing? Would you see that as better or easier to deal with?" So, in other words, the answer is yes?[[User:Novel-Technology|Novel-Technology]] 01:01, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
== proselyting vs. proselytizing ==
|