Talk:Meta-modeling technique: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
reflection
Concerns
Line 5:
 
Upon reflection, I think it would be better if this article was ''generalized'' to cover more than just the single meta-modeling technique described here. There are a number of other approaches to meta-modeling that might be compared and contrasted, as evidenced by [http://72.14.203.104/search?q=cache:rl6wEmpdcsQJ:moncs.cs.mcgill.ca/people/ylu/research/readingProject/report.pdf+meta-modelling+techniques&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=6 this report]. --[[User:Allan McInnes|Allan McInnes]] <small>([[User talk:Allan McInnes|talk]])</small> 18:24, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
 
Agree with the above comments. Metamodeling arguably originated with IRDS and CDIF, and has reached its fullest maturity in the thought leadership of the OMG. This is a particular spin on the topic and quite misleading as such.
 
[[User:Charles T. Betz|Charles T. Betz]] 01:15, 20 April 2006 (UTC)