Revision as of 15:55, 10 January 2012 edit Buridan (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 3,021 edits →Needs clarfication ← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:04, 15 May 2012 edit undo ThePhantasos (talk \| contribs) 230 edits →Poor example of CDA's criticism: new section Next edit →
Line 45: ==Notable Academics== on wikipedia, the standard of notability is set. redlinked people are always going to be non-notable until you make a page for them. if you add someone to the list, make sure they have a page first. --[[User:Buridan\|Buridan]] ([[User talk:Buridan\|talk]]) 15:55, 10 January 2012 (UTC) == Poor example of CDA's criticism == Vincent Tyson's article seems like a poor example of academic criticism. It is nonacademic and potentially Christian/pro-Capitalist propaganda if anything. He even cites the Bible. I'm sorry, but I have to ask: why is this even included? --[[User:ThePhantasos\|ThePhantasos]] ([[User talk:ThePhantasos\|talk]]) 22:04, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Talk:Critical discourse analysis: Difference between revisions