Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2012/Option 1: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Davdevalle (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 172:
# I would say '''No changes should be blocked''',for not any second, but '''This should only be used for marking''', state what pages haven't been reviewed.[[User:Justincheng12345|Justincheng12345]] ([[User_talk:Justincheng12345|talk]]) ([[:zh:User_talk:Justincheng12345|urgent news here]]) 11:01, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
# Absolutely, unequivically no. It is hard enough to find and keep editors without removing one of the few things (the satisfaction of editing and gratification of immediate publication) that works in that regard. A phrase about cracking walnuts with tanks springs to mind... [[User:Meetthefeebles|Meetthefeebles]] ([[User talk:Meetthefeebles|talk]]) 13:12, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
# '''Endorse''' Keep it as it is. The negative effect of a structural hierarchy of reviewers destroys the ethos of the project. It becomes edited by a few instead of edited by all.[[User:Davdevalle|Davdevalle]] ([[User talk:Davdevalle|talk]]) 14:30, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
|