Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2012/Option 1: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 12:05, 22 May 2012

Revision as of 13:51, 22 May 2012

Line 185:

#'''Endorse'''' We have a similar PC system in the german Wikipedia and it's better without it. Also people who don't edit wikipedia yet but thinking about doing their part will get problems wirh that and it will disattract a lot of potential new editors. -- [[User:Laberkiste|Laber□]]^{[[User_Talk:Laberkiste|T]]} 02:59, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

#'''Endorse''' per [[User:SoWhy|SoWhy]], [[User:Wnt|Wnt]], [[User:DGG|DGG]], [[User:WDGraham|W. D. Graham]], and [[User:Sandstein|Sandstein]], as well as per the past discussions. I additionally reaffirm that this tool is inefficient and counterproductive, that its deployment would inevitably dissuade new and anonymous editors from participating, that its handling has repeatedly violated the community's trust, and that we should never stand for any proposal designed to undermine core principles of the project. <span style="background:black;color:white">&nbsp;&nbsp;'''''—&nbsp;'''''[[User:CMBJ|<span style="background:black;color:white">'''''C&nbsp;M&nbsp;B&nbsp;J'''''</span>]]&nbsp;&nbsp;</span> 11:35, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

#At first sight, it seems to be a good initiative to protect good articles from persistent vandalism. But there are thousands of articles that require further edits to get improved? How did Wikipedia grow up so soon? Only because people here can think themselves as the part of an encyclopedia as they can edit and add info from anywhere anytime and they can see their edits instantly displayed. Hence they feel motivated. Do you want Wikipedia to turn out to be [[Citizendium]]? In this age, people do not like hierarchy. If you can check pending changes, why don’t you make a list of new changes without keeping them pending? And then check them. If you find anything unreferenced, remove them. If you find anything that breaks Wikipedia policy, discuss. If you are so much concerned with the vandalism from unregistered users, then make sure that no unregistered user can edit Wikipedia. If you cannot trust them, how can they trust you? How will you make sure that all the administrators and reviewers would be unbiased and knowledgeable and they would not keep a change pending for its truthfulness? [[User:Smmmaniruzzaman|Smmmaniruzzaman]] ([[User talk:Smmmaniruzzaman|talk]]) 13:51, 22 May 2012 (UTC)