Talk:Comparison of relational database management systems: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Signing comment by 84.86.176.163 - "→How can MySQL possibly be ACID compliant? Surely it should be marked as "No" under ACID: " |
→Multiversion concurrency control: new section |
||
Line 268:
I think that it this article would be a lot more useful if it would also categorize database management systems by whether they use a client/server model or are serverless, or any other kinds of IPC (Inter-Process Communication) that they use. For example this makes a big difference between MySQL and SQLite. I added the stub category "Category:Database management systems by process model". I also [[Wikipedia:Requested_articles/Applied_arts_and_sciences/Computer_science,_computing,_and_Internet#Databases|requested an article]] for "List of serverless database management systems". It would be helpful to programmers and readers to have a list of serverless database management systems here in the comparison groupings and/or in a separate article, and the DBMS's should be categorized as such.
== [[Multiversion concurrency control]] ==
Some databases like [[Apache Derby]] do not support [[Multiversion concurrency control]]<ref>[https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4823 #DERBY-4823 multi-version concurrency control support - ASF JIRA]</ref>
Should we add this feature to the comparison? Where should it be added?
| |||