Revision as of 21:09, 28 May 2012 edit Jéské Couriano (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers 42,077 edits →Close?: Re ← Previous edit		Revision as of 21:12, 28 May 2012 edit undo Youreallycan (talk \| contribs) 12,095 edits →Timetime Next edit →
Line 529: :--[[User:Slakr\|<span style="color:teal;font-weight:bold;">slakr</span>]]<small><sup>\ [[User talk:Slakr\|talk]] /</sup></small> 21:09, 27 May 2012 (UTC) ::[[User:Slakr\|slakr]], I totally agree. A lot of problems would be eliminated by locking up articles, and only letting a select number of trusted people edit. But, then this wouldn't be Wikipedia with approximately 3,000,000 English-language articles, but instead ''Encyclopedia Brittanica'' with roughly 230,000 articles. Furthermore, while some Wikipedia articles have bias or mistakes, it's no worse than any other encyclopedia, and Wikipedia has a easy method of fixing those problems. [[User:NJ Wine\|NJ Wine]] ([[User talk:NJ Wine\|talk]]) 21:36, 27 May 2012 (UTC) * - @[[User:Slakr]] - The goal of Wikipedia isn't to be "trusted." It never has been" - We can disagree there all day long - <font color="purple">[[User:Youreallycan\|You]]</font><font color="orange">really</font><font color="red">[[User talk:Youreallycan\|can]]</font>

Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2012/Discussion: Difference between revisions