Revision as of 09:29, 31 May 2012 edit Petter Bøckman (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 8,728 edits →Proposals ← Previous edit		Revision as of 10:41, 31 May 2012 edit undo Chris55 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers 9,568 edits →Split Missing Link Next edit →
Line 80: Over 50 articles currently link directly to [[missing link]]. Maybe this is a good signal that the topic deserves its own article? --[[User:Beefyt\|beefyt]] ([[User talk:Beefyt\|talk]]) 03:58, 30 May 2012 (UTC) :Not quite true: they link indirectly to the current section. Looking at a few random examples, the redirect might better be to the head of the article. Missing link is still the popular term for "transitional fossil" and by Wikipedia rules that's where it should link. Few people know or care about the great chain of being. I think your proposal below is not supported by most people above. [[User:Chris55\|Chris55]] ([[User talk:Chris55\|talk]]) 10:41, 31 May 2012 (UTC) === Proposals===

Talk:Transitional fossil: Difference between revisions