Content deleted Content added
m moved Talk:Descriptive chess notation to Talk:Descriptive notation: "Descriptive notation" is what it is always called in the literature. "Descriptive chess notation" is a well intentioned but incorrect way to dab it. |
|||
Line 57:
:::: I disagree a little with that. The notation 9algebraic and descriptive) is "from - to". It is "from" a KP. [[User:Bubba73|Bubba73]] [[User talk:Bubba73|<sup>(You talkin' to me?)</sup>]], 03:39, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
One other use that might startle someone who reviews old chess literature may be when a rook who's all alone on his back rank moves "R-R1". As he cannot move to the R1 square upon which he now stands, he must be moving to the ''other'' R1, so it's unambiguous on a technicality. Indeed, the next move could indeed be "R-R1" again, if he's reacting to a new threat, or perhaps just wasting time. In some very old forms, the "1" square goes unnumbered, so one might see just "R-R". [[User:WHPratt|WHPratt]] ([[User talk:WHPratt|talk]]) 14:30, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
==Hindi/Urdu==
| |||