Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Aelfthrytha (talk | contribs) |
→Proposals, April 2006: Nigerian politician stubs |
||
Line 26:
==Proposals, April 2006==
<!--New proposals to the top, please -->
==={{cl|Nigerian politician stubs}}===
Double-stubbing finds 54, and CatScan 57; there must be a handful more someplace to push it over the top... [[User:Alai|Alai]] 06:03, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
===A problem which refuses to go away===
Kosovo-geo-stub was re-created recently, and I speedied it. I also protected the template from re-creation, due to the edit-warring over which template to use on a number of the articles on which it was placed. I've since been receiving a broadside from one particular Kosovan, [[User:Hipi Zhdripi]] (made harder to deal with because English is not exactly his first language). He also demanded a reinstatement of the template, but RFU refused it. The whole issue is, of course, very thorny, but I'm wondering whether it might be better to do what has been done with Kosovo-stub - that is, have a Kosovo-geo-stub template but have it feed into {{cl|Serbia geography stubs}}. The problem with that is it sets a dangerous precedent (we've got Transnistria-stub on SFD as it is, and the possibility of stubs for everywhere from Ossetia to Puntland doesn't raise a nice warm glow). I've received some good input from [[User:Ilir pz]], but more input would be welcome (I'm aware, for isntance, that most of the input so far has been from the Kosovan side of the fence - it's equally important not to annoy Serbs and Albanians). Any thoughts? Please? [[User:Grutness|Grutness]]...''<small><font color="#008822">[[User_talk:Grutness|wha?]]</font></small>'' 04:18, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
| |||