Content deleted Content added
→Proposals: it wouldn't be an improvement |
|||
Line 90:
:I personally would like them to remain one article, but there's certainly enough text to make a Missing Link article. It needs a bit of work though, as it must also present the concept of evolutionary intermediates. [[User:Petter Bøckman|Petter Bøckman]] ([[User talk:Petter Bøckman|talk]]) 09:28, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
:You've done it as well as it can probably be done, but it still has the effect of weakening a Good Article, and of splitting one subject into two articles; and there is the likelihood of increased content forking as people add material to both articles to replace the 'missing' bits not present in each half. No, it's far more satisfactory to leave it as it is, I'm afraid. [[User:Chiswick Chap|Chiswick Chap]] ([[User talk:Chiswick Chap|talk]]) 06:46, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
| |||