Content deleted Content added
add Perl WikiProject banner using AWB |
→This Article Could Be Better: new section |
||
Line 108:
Even if the distinction is purely artificial (I suspect there's differing opinions on that!) it's an obvious thing to talk about.[[User:Isaac Rabinovitch|Isaac R]] ([[User talk:Isaac Rabinovitch|talk]]) 18:14, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
== <verbiage-conversion type="DIPLOMATIC">This Article Could Be Better</verbiage-conversion> ==
I'll see if I can find the time to take a crack at this article. It's in rough shape.
I think that the problem here is that it tries to define [[Dynamic programming language]] as a first order categorization. As other commenters have stated, "Dynamic" is used to refer to a large collection of semantics of a programming language.
The term "dynamic programming language" is a rather loose term used to categorize a programming language that tends to have many dynamic features. Sometimes "dynamic programming language" is used as a comparator of two or more languages. For example: "Why are you using C when a more dynamic programming language such as Lisp seems a better choice?"
If I can find the time, I'll take a whack at it.
[[User:Neil Smithline|Neil Smithline]] ([[User talk:Neil Smithline|talk]]) 20:49, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
| |||