Wikipedia:Graphics Lab/Photography workshop/Archive/Jun 2012: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 07:01, 6 June 2012

Revision as of 07:01, 7 June 2012

Line 62:

{{Done}} - Grabbed file. I will leave it up to you to flesh out description, figure out who the author is and add a category or two. – [[User:Jbarta|JBarta]] ([[User talk:Jbarta#top|talk]]) 04:05, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

*Thanks — [[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 07:37, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

== Duke of Caxias (translucid background) ==

{{resolved}}

<!-- nothing or {{resolved|1=~~~}} or {{Stale|1=~~~}} -->

<gallery align="center">

File:Ana Luisa de Loreto wife of Caxias with siblings.jpg|The Duke of Caxias' wife when a child

File:Caxias in Paraguay.jpg|The Duke of Caxias on horseback

File:Angela fuerriol gonzalez 1832.jpg|Ângela Fierriol Gonzalez

</gallery>

'''Article(s):''' [[Luís Alves de Lima e Silva, Duke of Caxias]]

'''Request:''' Hi, everyone. I need a .png copy of all three files with translucid background such as in [[:File:Joaquim da Rocha Fragoso - Duque de Caxias, 1875.png|this picture]]. Thank you very much, [[User:Lecen|Lecen]] ([[User talk:Lecen|talk]]) 00:43, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

'''Graphist opinion(s):'''

<!-- This area is for wikigraphists:

{{I take|1=~~~}}: when you accept the request ;

{{Done}}: when the request is done. -->

Did my own thing to the steamship image. Left as jpg and squared off corners, didn't rotate (didn't think it was needed), adjusted colors. Hopefully it suits you. &ndash;&nbsp;[[User:Jbarta|JBarta]] ([[User talk:Jbarta#top|talk]]) 02:18, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

:It looks great, JBarta. Thank you very much. Now I'll only have to wait for someone else to work on the other pictures. Again, thank you. Regards, --[[User:Lecen|Lecen]] ([[User talk:Lecen|talk]]) 01:31, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

::{{Done}} - Also, I have rotated images 1 and 3. The files are:

:::*[[:File:Ana Luisa de Loreto wife of Caxias with siblings.png]]

:::*[[:File:Caxias in Paraguay.png]]

:::*[[:File:Angela fuerriol gonzalez 1832.png]]

::--[[User:GianniG46|GianniG46]] ([[User talk:GianniG46|talk]]) 21:18, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

== Duke of Caxias (crooked pictures) ==

{{resolved}}

<!-- nothing or {{resolved|1=~~~}} or {{Stale|1=~~~}} -->

<gallery align="center">

File:Baron of caxias 1845.jpg|Caxias, 1845

File:Pedro II Caxias and others 1865.jpg|Caxias in a military parade

File:Caxias leads the Brazilian Army.jpg|Caxias on horseback

File:Sabara by Rugendas.jpg|Brazilian town of Sabará

</gallery>

'''Article(s):''' [[Luís Alves de Lima e Silva, Duke of Caxias]]

'''Request:''' All the pictures above have the same problem: they are crooked. Please straighten them all. Thank you, --[[User:Lecen|Lecen]] ([[User talk:Lecen|talk]]) 00:47, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

'''Graphist opinion(s):''' {{Done}} - I have straightened the first three images, by rotating them very, very slightly. The last doesn't look crooked: in particular, the belltowers appear perfectly vertical. I have been careful to avoid overcropping the result. Not all the original frames are rectangular: for example, the top line in the third image is not perfectly horizontal; I suggest further cropping, there. --[[User:GianniG46|GianniG46]] ([[User talk:GianniG46|talk]]) 22:32, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

<!-- This area is for wikigraphists:

{{I take|1=~~~}}: when you accept the request ;

{{Done}}: when the request is done. -->

== Observation Deck at the Owen Roberts International Airport==

{{resolved}}

<!-- nothing or {{resolved|1=~~~}} or {{Stale|1=~~~}} -->

<gallery align="center">

File:Observation Deck at the Owen Roberts International Airport.jpg|

</gallery>

'''Article(s):''' [[Owen Roberts International Airport]]

'''Request:''' Remove watermark and decorative border [[Special:Contributions/92.14.181.53|92.14.181.53]] ([[User talk:92.14.181.53|talk]]) 11:04, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

'''Graphist opinion(s):''' {{Done}} --[[User:GianniG46|GianniG46]] ([[User talk:GianniG46|talk]]) 15:25, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

<!-- This area is for wikigraphists:

{{I take|1=~~~}}: when you accept the request ;

{{Done}}: when the request is done. -->

== ZHP ==

{{resolved|1=[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Kintetsubuffalo]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo|talk]])}}

<gallery align="center">

File:Krzyz Harcerski HR.png

File:Krzyz Harcerski HR 1.png

File:Krzyz_Harcerski_HR2.png

File:Krzyz Harcerski HR (rotated).png|Rotated 30deg.<br />That any use?<br />[[User:Nagualdesign|nagualdesign]]

</gallery>

'''Article(s):''' [[ZHP]]

'''Request:''' fix perspective-artistic but not Wikilike... [[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Kintetsubuffalo]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo|talk]]) 06:04, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

'''Graphist opinion(s):'''

<!-- This area is for wikigraphists:

{{I take|1=~~~}}: when you accept the request ;

{{Done}}: when the request is done. -->

{{collapse top}}

{{Archive top}}

First... what is ''"artistic but not Wikilike"''? Second, altering perspective doesn't work very well with 3D objects... only 2D... like paintings, etc. Personally I think it's a fine image just the way it is. &ndash;&nbsp;[[User:Jbarta|JBarta]] ([[User talk:Jbarta#top|talk]]) 07:01, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

:JBarta, can you please stop leaving these drive-by comments on my requests? This is the second time you've done this to me, and it makes the section look like it is being addressed when it is not. Consequently the request gets ignored. The color commentary is gratuitous and unnecessary. Either fix it or leave off commenting, please.--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Kintetsubuffalo]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo|talk]]) 15:12, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

::I'll limit myself here to simply telling you this... be assured that my comments will not stop other editors from looking at the image and doing something with it if they wish. Good luck. &ndash;&nbsp;[[User:Jbarta|JBarta]] ([[User talk:Jbarta#top|talk]]) 16:53, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Despite your objections this little dialogue actually made me ''want'' to take a squiz, and having looked I concur with JB; the only way I can see to 'fix' the perspective would be to create a 3D model of the object, use the photo to wrap the texture to the model, then manipulate the 3D model to view it squarely (assuming that is what you meant by 'fix'). That ain't gonna happen. This information I give freely in order to help you, as was the case with JB's 'drive-by' comment. Stop being so combative or you may find your requests really do get ignored. Regards, [[User:Nagualdesign|nagualdesign]] ([[User talk:Nagualdesign|talk]]) 00:26, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Calm down boys, you just need more firepower. Now, do you have a similar pin that is pictured from straight on, I could further adjust the perspective if I know what shape they are, as I've never seen one before so I don't know. <span style="text-shadow:#c5C3e3 0.2em 0.2em 0.2em;">[[User:Penyulap|'''Penyulap''']]</span>[[User talk:Penyulap|<span style="color:transparent;text-shadow:green 0em 0.2em 0.02em;"> ☏</span>]] 11:53, 4 Jun 2012 (UTC)

:Haha! Nice try, Penyulap, but liquifying the image isn't exactly encyclopedic either. It doesn't look too bad though, apart from the top part, which is neither symmetrical (left/right) or a reflection of the bottom part. Seems reasonable to assume that all 4 parts would share rotational symmetry when viewed squarely and that the centre should be circular. But even if you get those details down the finished image will be more art than science, based on speculation and assumption. Do you think that perhaps there is nothing wrong with the angled shot, which is factually accurate and nicely displays the 3 dimensional form? Regards, [[User:Nagualdesign|nagualdesign]] ([[User talk:Nagualdesign|talk]]) 14:36, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

:If someone want's a head-on 2D image image of that particular iron cross, why not simply draw it? Why insist on such a convoluted path to get from point A to point B? &ndash;&nbsp;[[User:Jbarta|JBarta]] ([[User talk:Jbarta#top|talk]]) 18:20, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

::I'm here to help ordinary editors making perfectly reasonable requests, according to whatsoever they ask me. Telling requesters that something can't be done because you are incapable of doing it, well I can't see the point really, that's not the primary purpose of the graphics lab, actually is that what the graphics lab is about at all ? Maybe we need to remove the word 'opinion' and replace it with something more helpful, as it seems to give some people [[The Argument Sketch|the wrong idea about what the graphics lab is all about]], maybe it is giving the impression that the graphics lab is some kind of wannabe art critics corner do you think ? It is not the place for the wannabe artist to debate with the requester that their request has no merit, it's simply a matter of if you cannot do it, then there is no need to tell everyone in uncertain terms that you cannot do it, just leave it for the next artist to give it a go.

::Anyhow, giving me a long list of critique is kind of moot/pointless unless you ''ARE'' the requester. It stands to reason that the only expert here on what is wanted is the person who is doing the asking in the first place. <span style="text-shadow:#c5C3e3 0.2em 0.2em 0.2em;">[[User:Penyulap|'''Penyulap''']]</span>[[User talk:Penyulap|<span style="color:transparent;text-shadow:green 0em 0.2em 0.02em;"> ☏</span>]] 00:13, 5 Jun 2012 (UTC)

:::Kintetsubuffalo, I await further input or commentary, ''from you'' <span style="text-shadow:#c5C3e3 0.2em 0.2em 0.2em;">[[User:Penyulap|'''Penyulap''']]</span>[[User talk:Penyulap|<span style="color:transparent;text-shadow:green 0em 0.2em 0.02em;"> ☏</span>]] 00:15, 5 Jun 2012 (UTC)

::::No need to get so irate, Penyulap! ''':-/''' Nobody reprimanded Kintetsubuffalo, just questioned the request and offered some feedback (albeit without any unnecessary pandering). This is an ''encyclopedia'', not an art gallery, so any deviation from the facts should be fair game, whether it's written or pictorial. I asked a pretty simple question; Do you think that perhaps there is nothing wrong with the angled shot, which is factually accurate and nicely displays the 3 dimensional form? If you think that was rude of me and that I should keep my opinions to myself then you have misunderstood the nature of Wikipedia. I wasn't 'critiquing your artwork', I was pointing out the errors you made that misrepresent the object pictured. If the requestor had said it was okay as it was that would not make it so. [[User:Nagualdesign|nagualdesign]] ([[User talk:Nagualdesign|talk]]) 01:04, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Penyulap, you're talking a lot of big talk... and that's fine... but it would probably be a little more convincing if you backed it up with a little big action. Your effort is a reasonable start... but it is hardly impressive at this point. If manipulating the existing image is the route you wish to go, then then it needs to be improved. And you certainly don't need Kintetsubuffalo or anyone else to tell you that... you should already know it. If you think that altering perspective on a 3D object is indeed a simple task for someone like you, then just do it. It needs to be symmetrical and presentable. Bang out ''a great job the first time'' and I promise no one will argue with you and you'll get all the props you're looking for without having to squabble for it. &ndash;&nbsp;[[User:Jbarta|JBarta]] ([[User talk:Jbarta#top|talk]]) 02:31, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

:Nagualdesign, I'm not being combative, I'm pointing out what I see as a regular unconstructive pattern. JBarta does some great work, but the "I think the request is no good" type comments don't enhance the project. After the comment, the request just sat until I said something.　That being said, JBarta does good work and I hold no ill will. Request on my part, nothing further needs read into my comments. That being said, File:Krzyz Harcerski HR 1.png (the middle image) is very close to what I want, save for a transparent background. That's what I am going for.--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Kintetsubuffalo]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo|talk]]) 05:18, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

::Is this what you'd like Kintetsubuffalo ? If you can help by altering the description and licence on my works that would help me. <span style="text-shadow:#c5C3e3 0.2em 0.2em 0.2em;">[[User:Penyulap|'''Penyulap''']]</span>[[User talk:Penyulap|<span style="color:transparent;text-shadow:green 0em 0.2em 0.02em;"> ☏</span>]] 08:18, 5 Jun 2012 (UTC)

:::You other 'big talkers' are most welcome to further improve the image and nominate it for featured picture. Please, be my guest. However, if Kintetsubuffalo is happy, then I am happy, and considering this seems to be something to do with kids reading about scouting (correct me if I am wrong) and the image is used 100pixels or so wide on a dozen pages, I'd say the job got done while you lot were trying to convince everyone it couldn't be done. I am very satisfied. <span style="text-shadow:#c5C3e3 0.2em 0.2em 0.2em;">[[User:Penyulap|'''Penyulap''']]</span>[[User talk:Penyulap|<span style="color:transparent;text-shadow:green 0em 0.2em 0.02em;"> ☏</span>]] 08:18, 5 Jun 2012 (UTC)

::::oh, and please ask for the draft to be deleted. <span style="text-shadow:#c5C3e3 0.2em 0.2em 0.2em;">[[User:Penyulap|'''Penyulap''']]</span>[[User talk:Penyulap|<span style="color:transparent;text-shadow:green 0em 0.2em 0.02em;"> ☏</span>]] 08:20, 5 Jun 2012 (UTC)

Kintetsubuffalo, as you can see, altering perspective on a 3D object can be a little rough. Can it be done? Sure... ''anything'' can be done. You can build a barn out of toothpicks, but that doesn't mean someone will do it or that it's even a good idea in the first place. Penyulap's half-baked attempt above is one way to go about it... alter, mirror, cut, paste, etc, etc. The result, if done well, can look decent and may be what you had in mind, but it takes a lot of work and the results still probably won't be optimal... especially compared to a perfecly respectable original photograph or other methods. Another possiblity is to draw it from scratch. You might drop that request into the [[WP:GL/I|Illustration workshop]]. Someone might draw you the cross and it might look a hundred times better than a manipulated button. And lastly, if I offer an opinion and you don't like it, that's fine. You're welcome to think I'm a complete idiot. But don't think the solution is to tell me just to shut up, and definitely don't think that actions of other editors hinge on my utterances, they don't... as you can plainly see. Though you must admit, the results of this tortured excursion bore out the correctness of my original comment. And I'm still wondering... what is ''artistic but not Wikilike''?? &ndash;&nbsp;[[User:Jbarta|JBarta]] ([[User talk:Jbarta#top|talk]]) 17:49, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

:Lolz. It means what I did, not what you lot ''talked about''. "artistic" as in artists impression, something that does not require perfection or even accuracy. "not wikilike" as in something that doesn't have to pass the test of a dozen wannabee art critics on commons holding their chins in their hand and saying 'anti-aliasing is a problem' while hoping that it's an image with aliasing in it, cause they don't know what aliasing is. lolz. It's not intended to be over-encyclopedic, Have you looked where it goes ? I think it's 150 pixels wide in a template and 72 pixels wide in the articles. So please be my guest, in fact I will help you write the application for an allotment of time on the government mainframe normally used to model climate change and particle physics so that we can get an 'encyclopaedic looking' 72pixel version through 3D rendering.

:Personally I think the very top of the image could use a little bit of a stretch myself, and would be happy to, however I'd need to be asked first, because the only person in this equation who knows what is wanted is the requester, not me. So if he/she says it's ok, it's ok, as in finished, if they say oh please do fix the top a bit more, then I shall. If a dozen people on commons say blah blah blah I don't know cause I was doing something else. Oh that reminds me, I have to check my watchlist. bye. <span style="text-shadow:#c5C3e3 0.2em 0.2em 0.2em;">[[User:Penyulap|'''Penyulap''']]</span>[[User talk:Penyulap|<span style="color:transparent;text-shadow:green 0em 0.2em 0.02em;"> ☏</span>]] 22:51, 5 Jun 2012 (UTC)

::Why do you need to be asked? Why not just do a good job all on your own? &ndash;&nbsp;[[User:Jbarta|JBarta]] ([[User talk:Jbarta#top|talk]])

::::if someone wants you to sell them a scooter so they can go to the local library and occasionally the shops there is no need to build them the space shuttle. It's a function of prioritising, and telling someone there is nothing wrong with the original image is [[wp:own|own]]ership, compounded by the fact you know nothing about the article(s) in question. <span style="text-shadow:#c5C3e3 0.2em 0.2em 0.2em;">[[User:Penyulap|'''Penyulap''']]</span>[[User talk:Penyulap|<span style="color:transparent;text-shadow:green 0em 0.2em 0.02em;"> ☏</span>]] 00:14, 6 Jun 2012 (UTC)

:::::I was thinking more like if someone asks for a scooter and you give them a scooter unpainted, with only one wheel and you know it's a poor scooter but you ask them if they like it anyway and you *could* make it a decent scooter but they have to ask first. Seems to me if you have any pride as a craftsman you'd want to do a good job right up front and not need to be asked to make it decent. Pride comes from a job well done... not a half-assed job and a lot of talk. &ndash;&nbsp;[[User:Jbarta|JBarta]] ([[User talk:Jbarta#top|talk]]) 00:44, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

:::Funny that; I thought Kintetsubuffalo was saying that the ''original'' image was artistic but not Wikilike, meaning that the replacement should be ''more'' Wikilike and ''less'' artistic. Just goes to show that the simple question first asked by JB was a valid one. By the way Penyulap, if you read through this you might notice that the only person here being intentionally rude is you. Even Kintetsubuffalo's combative response was kind of understandable (the straw had broken the camel's back) once he/she explained it. You on the other hand have gone down the path of unnecessarily spouting vitriol whilst purporting to be against such behaviour. I laughed at your 'calm down boys' because I thought it was witty, then I said you'd made a nice try and that your effort didn't look too bad apart from the top part. There was no 'long list of critique' as you saw it. Throwing out comments like 'wannabe' or that I/we don't know what anti-aliasing means is just childish. I certainly do know what I'm talking about and have been gainfully employed as such for many years. That said, there should be no reason for me to prove my credentials as the mistakes that you have made are pretty self-evident. Take a look at the dodgy top bit and tell me ''"it's okay, because this is only for kids reading about scouting"'' or ''"it's okay because Kintetsubuffalo says it's okay"'' and I'll refer you to the appropriate guidelines. I might even start a new request myself for the same image. You'll do whatsoever I ask then, right? Pfff... [[User:Nagualdesign|nagualdesign]] ([[User talk:Nagualdesign|talk]]) 23:46, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

::::Wow, do you mean you're employed as a polish scout ? my, I am impressed. no but seriously, what are you saying here, you've been employed for many years so you own the article, own the image, err, we should all listen to you ? this just gets worse by the minute.

::::I was thinking an artist makes art. Whilst a critic criticises. How wrong I was.^{[[sarcasm|1]]} See, this is why I don't normally criticise my own work, as a rule, because it's giving bullets to your critics who would be better off without them. But go ahead and make your request, be my guest. <span style="text-shadow:#c5C3e3 0.2em 0.2em 0.2em;">[[User:Penyulap|'''Penyulap''']]</span>[[User talk:Penyulap|<span style="color:transparent;text-shadow:green 0em 0.2em 0.02em;"> ☏</span>]] 00:14, 6 Jun 2012 (UTC)

:::::As a graphic designer. So I'm not a 'wannabe' and I don't pretend to understand anti-aliasing (or anything else) whilst knowing nothing. And as a Wikipedian I like to offer my informed opinions. Why must you be so childish and rude? I never said that your images were crap, and you seem to understand that it needs more work. You even agree with me about what exactly needs to be changed in order to bring the image up to standard. (Although you lack the impetus to just get on with it!) So what part of this do you percieve as 'bullets'? If you make a poor quality edit to an article do you insult people when they revert your edits? Get a grip, for Christ's sake. You're behaviour is unwarranted. [[User:Nagualdesign|nagualdesign]] ([[User talk:Nagualdesign|talk]]) 01:45, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

::::::I see a few problems here, there is an assumption that I am making any attempt to follow any image suggestions from people other than the requester. There is also the idea that my conversational draft was intended as final product, not necessarily the case (re-reading helps here for both points).

::::::The idea that I am agreeing "about what exactly needs to be changed in order to bring the image up to standard" is just labouring under the misunderstandings outlined above. You might be agreeing with what I outlined in the first place, but I'm hardly going to be putting in effort agreeing with you agreeing with me, as my focus is on the needs of the requester. Just because the draft may seem impressive to you, doesn't mean it's anything except me asking 'is this the sort of thing that you want', you guys should have already noticed that your written text based conversation was failing, or at least, you didn't seem to know what 'artistic but not Wikilike' meant. I understood both, but to make sure everyone is on the same page, just drew the thing. Easy, fast, end of story and the image-related conversation continues.

::::::You're don't seem to want to help the requester at all, didn't you say "That ain't gonna happen." that was what you said wasn't it ? and agreeing with the abrasive 'drive-by' comment, and then going on to suggest "your requests really do get ignored". So go ahead and insult me, it takes one to know one. :) <span style="text-shadow:#c5C3e3 0.2em 0.2em 0.2em;">[[User:Penyulap|'''Penyulap''']]</span>[[User talk:Penyulap|<span style="color:transparent;text-shadow:green 0em 0.2em 0.02em;"> ☏</span>]] 03:01, 6 Jun 2012 (UTC)

:::::::I only understood about half of that. (''You might be agreeing with what I outlined in the first place, but I'm hardly going to be putting in effort agreeing with you agreeing with me.'' Err..?!) Also, I'm not sure why you've moved this discussion to my talk page (where I'm likely to delete it), but let's stick to the original issues. We still don't know what 'artistic but not Wikilike' meant, do we? In fact, if the requester ''wanted'' the finished image to be 'not Wikilike' there will almost certainly be an issue there. I said that the 3D modelling thing wasn't going to happen. (Though it doesn't require a 'government mainframe'. SketchUp will probably do.) I don't think JBarta's comment was in the least bit abrasive. And I actually said, ''"Stop being so combative or you may find your requests really do get ignored."'' Which is a fact (note the word 'may', right?) More importantly, I didn't insult you at any point in any way and I challenge you to point out where I did.

:::::::Back to the discussion, the points of which you repeatedly failed to address; Your edit wasn't too bad apart from the top part, which ought to be fixed whether Kintetsubuffalo asks you or not. And do you think that perhaps there is nothing wrong with the angled shot, which is factually accurate and nicely displays the 3 dimensional form? You never did answer that.

:::::::Finally, you are rude! Whether or not you appreciate being pulled up on this issue it is a fact. I read through some of your contributions and discovered that I'm not the first person to tell you this. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt that you're not an asshole in person, you just have poor communication skills on Wikipedia. Perhaps you should take the collective feedback onboard and stop insulting people, even if you are only trying to be humorous. It isn't funny and it comes across as childish at best. Case in point; ''"It takes one to know one. :)"''

:::::::I expect that you'll take none of what I've said in the way that I meant it, even though I have earnestly tried to be clear and unambiguous. It seems that once you've interpreted a comment as threatening to your self-image you can only focus your efforts on inflicting as much pain on others as you have felt, rather than working towards an amicable resolution, and I haven't got the energy or inclination to help you with that. I will say this though; Virtue its own reward. All the best, [[User:Nagualdesign|nagualdesign]] ([[User talk:Nagualdesign#top|talk]]) 03:59, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

What do they say in American, '[[WP:ANI|tell someone who cares]]' ? no wait, it's "have a nice day", yes, you "have a nice day" and I'd like to warn you that your comments contain numerous personal attacks and are disruptive to the functioning of the page. This is not the place to continue your discussion. <span style="text-shadow:#c5C3e3 0.2em 0.2em 0.2em;">[[User:Penyulap|'''Penyulap''']]</span>[[User talk:Penyulap|<span style="color:transparent;text-shadow:green 0em 0.2em 0.02em;"> ☏</span>]] 05:08, 6 Jun 2012 (UTC)

:Yes, very mature response. I'm not sure what you meant by ''tell someone who cares'', or what your warning means. Please feel free to mention 'my' discussion on the ANI. Perhaps someone might be kind enough to tell me where I made numerous personal attacks. [[User:Nagualdesign|nagualdesign]] ([[User talk:Nagualdesign|talk]]) 05:20, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

'''As it seems''' to be quickly going nowhere good, it's probably best that both parties drop this particular line of discussion right here. &ndash;&nbsp;[[User:Jbarta|JBarta]] ([[User talk:Jbarta#top|talk]]) 05:24, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

{{Archive bottom}}

{{collapse bottom}}

<s>Kintetsubuffalo, I'd like to know how you feel about the second image I have made. <span style="text-shadow:#c5C3e3 0.2em 0.2em 0.2em;">[[User:Penyulap|'''Penyulap''']]</span>[[User talk:Penyulap|<span style="color:transparent;text-shadow:green 0em 0.2em 0.02em;"> ☏</span>]] 05:35, 6 Jun 2012 (UTC)</s>

:Lolz, it was only when I collapsed it, that I could see that the matter was resolved to Kintetsubuffalo's satisfaction. <span style="text-shadow:#c5C3e3 0.2em 0.2em 0.2em;">[[User:Penyulap|'''Penyulap''']]</span>[[User talk:Penyulap|<span style="color:transparent;text-shadow:green 0em 0.2em 0.02em;"> ☏</span>]] 05:38, 6 Jun 2012 (UTC)

== Falkland House ==

{{resolved}}

<!-- nothing or {{resolved|1=~~~}} or {{Stale|1=~~~}} -->

<gallery align="center">

File:Falkland Islands Office Westminster.jpg|Falkland House

</gallery>

'''Article(s):''' [[Politics of the Falkland Islands]]

'''Request:''' Crop out the buildings on either side of Falkland House [[Special:Contributions/92.14.181.53|92.14.181.53]] ([[User talk:92.14.181.53|talk]]) 14:22, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

'''Graphist opinion(s):'''{{Done}} Image cropped and perspective adjusted. [[User:Centpacrr|Centpacrr]] ([[User talk:Centpacrr|talk]]) 16:05, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

<!-- This area is for wikigraphists:

{{I take|1=~~~}}: when you accept the request ;

{{Done}}: when the request is done. -->

== New Pictures ==

{{resolved}}

<!-- nothing or {{resolved|1=~~~}} or {{Stale|1=~~~}} -->

<gallery align="center">

File:ImGoingBananasUnderGround.jpg|Remove watermark and sharpen color a little bit

File:LaIslaBonitaunderGround.jpg|Remove watermark and sharpen color a little bit.

File:LikeAVirginUnderGround.jpg|Remove watermark and sharpen color a little bit.

File:LikeAVirginUnderGround2.jpg|Remove watermark and sharpen color a little bit.

File:RainGirlieShowUnderGround.jpg|Remove watermark and sharpen color a little bit.

</gallery>

'''Request:''' Remove watermark and sharpen color a little bit.--[[User:Lil&#39;Monster Heart|Lil&#39;Monster Heart]] ([[User talk:Lil&#39;Monster Heart|talk]]) 22:11, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

'''Graphist opinion(s):''' {{Done}} --[[User:GianniG46|GianniG46]] ([[User talk:GianniG46|talk]]) 12:32, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

<!-- This area is for wikigraphists:

{{I take|1=~~~}}: when you accept the request ;

{{Done}}: when the request is done. -->

== king plate ==

{{resolved|1=[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Kintetsubuffalo]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo|talk]])}}

<gallery align="center">

File:BreastplateCobornJackey.jpg

</gallery>

'''Article(s):''' [[king plate]]

'''Request:''' reduce glare, remove excess odd space in border... [[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Kintetsubuffalo]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo|talk]]) 02:12, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

'''Graphist opinion(s):''' {{Done}}: Howzat? [[User:Nagualdesign|nagualdesign]] ([[User talk:Nagualdesign|talk]]) 04:18, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

:Fantastic, thank you!--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Kintetsubuffalo]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo|talk]]) 05:19, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

::At the risk of committing the dreadful sin of a "drive-by comment", I think this image could be improved by evening out the lightness of the object. As it is, there are still remnants of reflection on the left and right. &ndash;&nbsp;[[User:Jbarta|JBarta]] ([[User talk:Jbarta#top|talk]]) 06:33, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

:::I agree. Looks worse than it did last night, if you know what I mean. [[User:Nagualdesign|nagualdesign]] ([[User talk:Nagualdesign|talk]]) 14:41, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

::::Tweeked it some more. Comparing my 2 versions it looks like there's a few patches where I've accidentally desaturated it, but viewed on its own it isn't too bad. T'll do. [[User:Nagualdesign|nagualdesign]] ([[User talk:Nagualdesign|talk]]) 20:05, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

:Listen, I have already explained myself-nothing negative in this comment, in fact you're right. Can you do it?--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Kintetsubuffalo]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo|talk]]) 13:36, 5 June 2012 (UTC)