Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Reliability/Self-published source usage report: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 13:
:That issue has not been even thought about yet. My guess is that sometime in 2013 I could look at that. What this report includes is really just the tip of the proverbial iceberg. The next steps will be to resolve the ambiguities here, then deal with ISBN usage by looking up in Worldcat. That should hopefully happen in 2012. In 2013 we could then look at reporting references that have no publisher and no ISBN. That is possible, but will require significant computing resources, e.g. two computers running 24 hours a day. Given the low cost of computers, that is not a big deal, however. In any case, that was a good suggestion and I will think about it more. Thanks. [[User:History2007|History2007]] ([[User talk:History2007|talk]]) 08:05, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
:If you have a concern about the reliability of a particular source in a particular article the [[WP:RS/N|reliable sources noticeboard]] is the best place to get help. [[User:Fifelfoo|Fifelfoo]] ([[User talk:Fifelfoo|talk]]) 21:44, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
| |||