Talk:Floyd–Warshall algorithm: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
First sentence: new section
Line 122:
I propose that we remove the reference to the commons example from the article body. If you don't want to lose the reference, put it in the exterior links section, or as a ref. [[User:Dmforcier|Dmforcier]] ([[User talk:Dmforcier|talk]]) 18:36, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
:I don't think those links should be in the article body at all. Few of them should be moved to External links, and the rest deleted. [[User:Svick|Svick]] ([[User talk:Svick|talk]]) 20:21, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
 
== First sentence ==
 
The article begins, "In Computer Science...". Doesn't this seem a bit pretentious and misleading? Floyd-Warshall's Algorithm has many different and unique applications, and it is certainly neither confined to the field of computer science nor dependent on computer science. If such a presumptive lead-in is to be used--I don't see a need for such a one, in my opinion its unnecessary--then the most generalized, pure categorization should be used, e.g. "In Graph Theory..." or, "In Mathematics...". Cheers.