Wikipedia talk:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2012: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 17:39, 5 July 2012

Revision as of 17:52, 5 July 2012

Line 239:

::::Oops, sorry, there's a problem I just noticed ... whenever you edit any page that begins "WP:Pending changes/" or "WT:Pending changes/", there's a kind of heavy-handed set of instructions that I don't think is appropriate for this phase of discussions. To avoid that "edit notice", I've moved the relevant pages to the page that I had picked out as a handy shortcut, WP:PC2012 (and WP:PC2012/Rivertorch, etc.). Is that okay? - Dank ([[User talk:Dank|push to talk]]) 17:23, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

:::::I preferred the previous locations, because they were in the hierarchy of [[WP:Pending changes]] and it was immediately clear what they were about. Another way around the edit notice would be to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Editnotices/Group/Wikipedia_talk:Pending_changes&action=edit edit the notice itself]. I don't think there are any RfCs going on curently, and now would be a good time to tone down the notice a bit, since it's obviously affecting a lot of pages. <span style="font-family:times; font-size:10.2pt">~[[User:Adjwilley|Adjwilley]]</span> <span style="font-family:times; font-size:7pt">([[User talk:Adjwilley|talk]])</span> 17:39, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

::::::I don't want to change the editnotice as part of a general strategy to leave all the previous pages (including even editnotices) exactly as they are; it will help people figure out what came before, and why, if they're looking into the history. And if the editnotice doesn't change, I'd rather we not be saddled with it. Is "PC2012" unclear? Is there a better name? - Dank ([[User talk:Dank|push to talk]]) 17:52, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

== Wtf ==