Wikipedia talk:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2012: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 18:14, 5 July 2012

Revision as of 18:17, 5 July 2012

Line 367:

*This type of filibustering and creating of uneccesarry procedural hurdles is what ruined the 2011 RFC and made it necessary to create the restrictive format used in this process. The time for moving backward i over, we need to move forwrd. I again appeal to any and all interested in moving forward to disengage frrom discussions analyzing or contesting the outcome. We don't need to particpate in them, despite the objections this thing ''' was''' handled properly. We are only wasting time by arguing on this point. [[User:Beeblebrox|Beeblebrox]] ([[User talk:Beeblebrox|talk]]) 17:22, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

:::This is a joke. The result is what it is and a rerun would come out the same. People need to accept and move on. If they don't work on the process the draft policy will be put in place which needs work done on it. No point wasting time on a pointless exercise given 4 good admin co-ordinators came to the correct conclusion based on the figures.[[User:Edinburgh Wanderer|<font color="Maroon">Edinburgh</font>]] [[User talk:Edinburgh Wanderer|<font color="green">Wanderer</font>]] 18:17, 5 July 2012 (UTC)