Wikipedia talk:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2012: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 12:01, 6 July 2012

Revision as of 05:14, 7 July 2012

Line 365:

:I'd actually venture to say that even if they ''do'' accept the case, the community should ''still'' pursue establishing a proper (orderly, open, defined, and limited) peer review platform for contested RFC closures. <span style="background:black;color:white">&nbsp;&nbsp;'''''—&nbsp;'''''[[User:CMBJ|<span style="background:black;color:white">'''''C&nbsp;M&nbsp;B&nbsp;J'''''</span>]]&nbsp;&nbsp;</span> 22:52, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

::I agree that having something to review RfC closures would be good. See also [[User talk:Jc37#Arbitration on Pending Changes RfC close]]. [[User:Yaris678|Yaris678]] ([[User talk:Yaris678|talk]]) 12:01, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

:::My intent was to have the close reviewed, not to stymie PC. At this point, I've come to expect that no matter what the arguments, no matter how loud the opposition, I cannot trust anyone pro-PC to actually abide by mutually-agreed terms. (And before you ask, they brought the bad faith on themselves.) —<font color="228B22">[[User:Jéské Couriano|''Jeremy'']] [[User talk:Jéské Couriano|v^_^v]]</font> ^{<small>[[Special:Contributions/Jéské Couriano|Bori!]]</small>} 05:14, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

== Proposal: Survey ==