Content deleted Content added
Added statement about lack of recent development of the JBI platform when compared to commercial product ESB offerings. |
|||
Line 31:
Oracle <!-- change this to a reference [http://www.oracle.com/corporate/press/2006_oct/openworldsf06-07.html?rssid=rss_ocom_pr claims] --> claims its Fusion Middleware comes with JBI implementation.
[[TIBCO]] ActiveMatrix Service Grid provides a service container framework, based on the JSR 208 and [[Service component architecture|SCA]] specifications, allowing service containers (Java, Java EE, .net, BPEL) to be added as needed, as composite applications on a common foundation
JBI implementations have not kept pace with commercial product Enterprise Service Bus offerings, as current JBI offerings lack support for modern parsers (DFDL and XMLNSC), efficient graphical development tools, and shifting development tasks from the developer to automation. <ref> http://www.wikihost.org/w/eventdrivensoa/java_business_integration </ref>
== Existing JBI Components ==
Line 48 ⟶ 50:
* [http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=312 JSR 312 page on the JCP site]
* [http://www.osoa.org/display/Main/Relationship+of+SCA+and+JBI Open SOA article on JBI's relationship to SCA]
* [http://www.wikihost.org/w/eventdrivensoa/java_business_integration Discussion of differences between JBI and commercial product offerings.]
[[Category:Java enterprise platform|Business Integration]]
Line 56 ⟶ 59:
[[fr:Java Business Integration]]
[[ja:Java Business Integration]]
== References ==
{{reflist}}
| |||