Wikipedia talk:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2012: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Youreallycan (talk | contribs) →Filing RfArb was rejected by the Arbcom: add diff |
Aaron Schulz (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 376:
:I can already predict the rough opinion; about 310 people are going to say they were satisfied, about 180 people will say they weren't, and there will be a 15 vote swing either way. [[User:The Blade of the Northern Lights|The Blade of the Northern Lights]] ([[User talk:The Blade of the Northern Lights|<font face="MS Mincho" color="black">話して下さい</font>]]) 16:08, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
::I guess what you mean by "survey" is a sort of RfC on the RfC. Go for it. [[User:FormerIP|Formerip]] ([[User talk:FormerIP|talk]]) 16:11, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
::Yeah that will probably happen. It's unfortunate, this seemed like an obvious "no consensus" to me. '''[[User talk:Aaron Schulz|<font color="blue">Aar</font><font color="darkblue">on Sc</font><font color="black">hulz</font>]]''' 21:40, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
*This type of filibustering and creating of uneccesarry procedural hurdles is what ruined the 2011 RFC and made it necessary to create the restrictive format used in this process. The time for moving backward i over, we need to move forwrd. I again appeal to any and all interested in moving forward to disengage frrom discussions analyzing or contesting the outcome. We don't need to particpate in them, despite the objections this thing ''' was''' handled properly. We are only wasting time by arguing on this point. [[User:Beeblebrox|Beeblebrox]] ([[User talk:Beeblebrox|talk]]) 17:22, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
| |||