Talk:Comparison of Java and C++: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 01:15, 19 August 2012

Revision as of 01:58, 19 August 2012

Line 655:

Reading this article gave me quite a bit of pleasure, imagining how passionate some people can be about programming languages. The article itself is like a magnifying glass left on the top of a table filled with the history of programming languages - without the big picture it is hard to understand the details. There is no point in making a comparison between C++ and Java because the languages are not in competition, only people can do this silliness. A more neutral way to present the whole topic is by language feature, say, how do I declare objects, initialize them, pass them to methods, manage their allocation details and performance characteristics, etc. And not talk just about C++ and Java. Talk about SNOBOL, talk about Ada, talk about PROLOG. Stop living in the 21st century. Talk about the PDP/11, about Multics, about VAX/VMS, about the z80. Get serious. And take that object out of your pocket. [[Special:Contributions/72.195.132.8|72.195.132.8]] ([[User talk:72.195.132.8|talk]]) 01:12, 1 July 2012 (UTC)jcb

I have added more info and deleted unneeded statements. There is huge bias on java.