Talk:Cantor's first set theory article/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 55:
 
:As mentioned above, it's true that the claim hasn't been formally verified, though anecdotal evidence is strong. I don't see what's wrong with the language. How does removing this statement help our readers? [[User:AxelBoldt|AxelBoldt]] 00:20, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
 
Because it makes us less reliable as an encyclopedia to include information that can't be relied upon to be anything but the anecdotal experiences of our editors. It's the whole reason behind [[WP:V]]. [[User:Night Gyr|Night Gyr]] 01:13, 30 April 2006 (UTC)