Revision as of 22:15, 20 August 2012 edit HCA (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 11,340 edits →The dangerousness of these wild animals is understated in the article, which is ad copy for python sellers ← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:19, 20 August 2012 edit undo HCA (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 11,340 edits →ad copy language in article Next edit →
Line 166: and more. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Ocdnctx\|Ocdnctx]] ([[User talk:Ocdnctx\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Ocdnctx\|contribs]]) 12:31, 20 August 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> :None of these are factually incorrect. "Popularity" is an empirically observable phenomenon about the prevalence of the species in the pet trade relative to similar snakes. "Attractive", while a value judgement, can also be assessed empirically in that people purchase "morphs" more than "regulars" even though there is no difference beyond color. The phrases relating to their nature are similarly accurate, as I can personally attest to, especially when compared to other python species that have a more "high-strung" disposition. "Labyrinth" is simply the name of a morph, and the statement about their captive breeding is simply a statement of fact. [[User:HCA\|HCA]] ([[User talk:HCA\|talk]]) 22:19, 20 August 2012 (UTC) == Salmonella risk, from pro-python site ==

Talk:Burmese python: Difference between revisions