Content deleted Content added
Loadmaster (talk | contribs) m added missing sect title |
|||
Line 10:
:::Yeah Guys.. Just something to think about.. An encyclopedic Article on time.h would be - well just useless. And i'm happy with the english wikipedia as it is, with thousands of articles to even minor details, headerfiles, comic characters and so on. Please just don't take the german wiki as model, its so full of relevancy that it became entirely irrelevant. Rules like the NO-HOWTO are nice, but only IF the article would be better in an encyclopedic form - not in this case.[[Special:Contributions/77.11.26.13|77.11.26.13]] ([[User talk:77.11.26.13|talk]]) 20:43, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
Also, it's not strictly correct. On at least some systems (most?) there is time.h and sys/time.h, which are not identical. It would be nice if Wikipedia were truely autoritative, but one more partly-correct source is not helpful, IMO.
==Move discussion in progress==
| |||