KPbIC

Revision as of 22:04, 30 April 2006

Revision as of 01:48, 1 May 2006

Line 9:

134, it understandably annoyes the editor when he writes articles and others come just purge stuff from there and leave, even if others are right (I am not saying you are right here either, just pls understand the situation). Yes, Kazak doesn't own the article, but it would be nice if you helped add to the article rather than just censor the work of the main valuable editor who writes on the Metro of your native city. Don't step into the shoes of AndriyK who roamed into the whole bunch of articles others, mainly myself, wrote and made a small disastrous POV edits, be it [[Khreschatyk]], [[Chernihiv]], [[Beregynia]] stupid edit war or [[Verkhovna Rada building]]. There is no wiki-law against such habbits, it's just annoying and almost unethical, if you ask me. Compare it to my "intrusion" to AndriyK's [[Vasyl Stus]]. At least, I added and restyled the article, not only replaced the [[concentration camp]] by a [[penal colony]]. Please think about it, OK? --[[User:Irpen|Irpen]] 22:03, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

:Hope we agree that wikipedia is just an encyclopedia, it's not a board or a tool to express author's personal opinion to the rest of the world. If somebody forgets it a moment, and let his personal opinion sneak in, and then became angry if it's corrected, then at the end whose mistake that is?

:Or, let me put it defferentl. It may be "the main valuable editor" who put his POV in, or it may be a "censor" who is trying to put his POV in. Should the first be given some kind of parole to put his POV just because he wrote the rest of the article?