Revision as of 10:25, 3 September 2012 edit Sae1962 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 3,814 edits →Simplicity vs. feature richness ← Previous edit		Revision as of 06:09, 6 September 2012 edit undo 94.174.207.151 (talk) →Contradiction: BigDecimal Next edit →
Line 88: The simple answer, as stated in [[{{PAGENAME}}#Simple/primitive types\|section 1.3.2 Primitive types]] is NO. Don't worry, I already fixed it. [[Special:Contributions/68.173.113.106\|68.173.113.106]] ([[User talk:68.173.113.106\|talk]]) 03:29, 2 March 2012 (UTC) ::I'm adding a "yes (BigDecimal class)". It's a class rather than a primitive, but it's part of standard Java. The distinction is arguably ignorable; e.g. you wouldn't say "scala has no number types at all" because they're all classes. == Please PR this page ==

Talk:Comparison of C Sharp and Java: Difference between revisions