Revision as of 06:09, 6 September 2012 edit 94.174.207.151 (talk) →Contradiction: BigDecimal ← Previous edit		Revision as of 06:10, 6 September 2012 edit undo SineBot (talk \| contribs) Bots 2,564,786 edits m Signing comment by 94.174.207.151 - "→Contradiction: BigDecimal" Next edit →
Line 89: The simple answer, as stated in [[{{PAGENAME}}#Simple/primitive types\|section 1.3.2 Primitive types]] is NO. Don't worry, I already fixed it. [[Special:Contributions/68.173.113.106\|68.173.113.106]] ([[User talk:68.173.113.106\|talk]]) 03:29, 2 March 2012 (UTC) ::I'm adding a "yes (BigDecimal class)". It's a class rather than a primitive, but it's part of standard Java. The distinction is arguably ignorable; e.g. you wouldn't say "scala has no number types at all" because they're all classes. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/94.174.207.151\|94.174.207.151]] ([[User talk:94.174.207.151\|talk]]) 06:09, 6 September 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> == Please PR this page ==

Talk:Comparison of C Sharp and Java: Difference between revisions