Talk:Brouwer fixed-point theorem: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 01:10, 13 July 2012

Revision as of 09:55, 12 September 2012

Line 55:

:Hmmm...actually I see that since I last closely perused the article, somebody has added another proof of Brouwer for smooth maps. Per my comment right above, this is actually a proof for continuous maps also; I'll add that to the article. --[[User:C S|C S]][[User talk:C S| (Talk)]] 10:42, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

::There has been some little discussion on math.stackexchange [http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/194599/continuous-brouwers-fixed-point-theorem-via-stokess-theorem/194614#194614 here] about the validity of this proof. --[[User:Seaneberhard|Sean Eberhard]] ([[User talk:Seaneberhard|talk]]) 09:55, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

: Stokes theorem may well be derived from the Brouwer Fixed Point Theorem, so I would be weary of using it. But I am not certian of this, as I have not read the proof. --[[User:Dark Side of the Moon|Dark Side of the Moon]] 17:02, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

: Stokes theorem may well be derived from the Brouwer Fixed Point Theorem, so I would be wearywary of using it. But I am not certian of this, as I have not read the proof. --[[User:Dark Side of the Moon|Dark Side of the Moon]] 17:02, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

:: It's not. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/66.191.126.159|66.191.126.159]] ([[User talk:66.191.126.159|talk]]) 06:20, 21 November 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->