Talk:Comparison of C Sharp and Java: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 06:10, 6 September 2012

Revision as of 15:06, 12 September 2012

Line 36:

:I used both C# and Java after a long time with C++. I think the debiasing of the article should be done by ''explaining'' the differences of the two languages, not only enlisting them, which has been done at some places where it is written that delegates, for instance, have been deliberately left out. Like in this example, if Java is "missing" some features because it is older, this should be clearified and referenced. If a feature has been deliberately left, again, a referenced information is needed. And I propose to use a four-colour scheme so that deliberately left out features are marked with a colour different than green, yellow, or red.

:I think this discussion here shows that the article ''seems'' to be biased, but actually lacks referenced clarifications. As I used Java around two years and C# less than a year in projects, I think others with more experience would be more appropriate for the job of adding the missing information. To the experts: Please, please do not forget that you are writing for an encyclopedia. I plead to the prophets of both languages to add facts, if they are interested to add anything, and not a list of dogmas. [[User:Sae1962|Sae1962]] ([[User talk:Sae1962|talk]]) 10:25, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

I think that the article is no more biased. I plead to remove the marking that it is biased. [[User:Sae1962|Sae1962]] ([[User talk:Sae1962|talk]]) 15:06, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

== Unified type system ==