Revision as of 08:20, 13 September 2012 edit Useerup (talk \| contribs) 1,268 edits →Dubious claim about both languages not supporting arithmetic on all types: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 08:22, 13 September 2012 edit undo Useerup (talk \| contribs) 1,268 edits →Contradiction Next edit →
Line 94: ::I'm adding a "yes (BigDecimal class)". It's a class rather than a primitive, but it's part of standard Java. The distinction is arguably ignorable; e.g. you wouldn't say "scala has no number types at all" because they're all classes. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/94.174.207.151\|94.174.207.151]] ([[User talk:94.174.207.151\|talk]]) 06:09, 6 September 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> :::BigDecimal was already represented in the table. Java does not have a simple/primitive type with high precision. It has a arbitrarily high precision type in the class library (which C# does not). All of this is represented in the table. [[User:Useerup\|Useerup]] ([[User talk:Useerup\|talk]]) 08:22, 13 September 2012 (UTC) == Please PR this page ==

Talk:Comparison of C Sharp and Java: Difference between revisions