Revision as of 02:20, 25 September 2012 edit De Guerre (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 682 edits Delete vote ← Previous edit		Revision as of 17:46, 27 September 2012 edit undo Gene93k (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers 468,367 edits m Listing on WP:DELSORT under Computing Next edit →
Line 8: '''Delete''' - I take a liberal view in what should be on Wikipedia. However, I agree with the above comment. Everything I could find on the article's subject, at least in English, was written by the article's author. Wikipedia articles must have significant information from sources independent of the article's author. Unless the author can produce independent sources, I cannot be convinced to vote to keep this article. [[User:Wpollard\|Bill Pollard]] ([[User talk:Wpollard\|talk]]) 01:17, 24 September 2012 (UTC) '''Delete''' - [[WP:ONEDAY\|Wikipedia is not for things you wrote up for an academic journal one day.]] Agree with everything said above; this is a clear violation of [[WP:PRIMARY]] and [[WP:NOR]], and there are no third-party references (reliable or otherwise) apparent in the article or on Big Search Engine to indicate notability. [[User:De Guerre\|De Guerre]] ([[User talk:De Guerre\|talk]]) 02:20, 25 September 2012 (UTC) :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Computing\|list of Computing-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k\|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k\|talk]]) 17:46, 27 September 2012 (UTC)</small>

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Concept-oriented model: Difference between revisions