Revision as of 23:04, 7 October 2012 edit SineBot (talk \| contribs) Bots 2,564,749 edits m Signing comment by 173.191.159.38 - "" ← Previous edit		Revision as of 02:06, 8 October 2012 edit undo 173.191.159.38 (talk) →"Good" principles Next edit →
Line 80: == "Good" principles == It sounds a bit iffy to say that it's designed with "good" software engineering principles. This sounds like it's claiming that compiled, static-typed languages are always better than interpreted, dynamic-typed languages. -[[User:Qeny\|Qeny]] ([[User talk:Qeny\|talk]]) 00:40, 30 April 2009 (UTC) Nothing (other than their inescapable humanity) prevents a computer programmer from employing good software engineering principles without the help of a strong static type system. However, for those of us that would rather have help, these guys have 'designed' the language with good 'software engineering principles' in mind. I do not think the word 'good' is strong enough to imply exclusion anyhow. Good does not mean better. == Is the Mercury project dead? ==

Talk:Mercury (programming language): Difference between revisions