Content deleted Content added
m Signing comment by 173.191.159.38 - "→"Good" principles: " |
|||
Line 81:
It sounds a bit iffy to say that it's designed with "good" software engineering principles. This sounds like it's claiming that compiled, static-typed languages are always better than interpreted, dynamic-typed languages. -[[User:Qeny|Qeny]] ([[User talk:Qeny|talk]]) 00:40, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
Nothing (other than their inescapable humanity) prevents a computer programmer from employing good software engineering principles without the help of a strong static type system. However, for those of us that would rather have help, these guys have 'designed' the language with good 'software engineering principles' in mind. I do not think the word 'good' is strong enough to imply exclusion anyhow. Good does not mean better. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/173.191.159.38|173.191.159.38]] ([[User talk:173.191.159.38|talk]]) 02:06, 8 October 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
== Is the Mercury project dead? ==
| |||