Drug Interventions Programme: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 11:29, 18 March 2012

Revision as of 13:50, 12 October 2012

Line 1:

The '''Drug Interventions Programme''' is a key part of the United Kingdom's strategy for tackling [[drug abuse]].<ref>{{cite web

| last =

| first =

Line 11:

| format =

| doi =

| accessdate = }}</ref>. It aims to engage drug-misusing offenders involved in the [[Criminal Justice]] system in formal addiction treatment and other support, thereby reducing drug related harm and reducing offending behaviour .<ref>{{cite web

| last =

| first =

Line 23:

| format = pdf Page 8, section 2.5.1

| doi =

| accessdate = }}</ref>. Introduced in 2003, it formed a part of both of New Labour's '10 year' drug strategies.<ref>{{cite web

| last =

| first =

Line 35:

| format =

| doi =

| accessdate = }}</ref>. In their 2010 Drug Strategy, the Conservative / Liberal Democrat coalition state their continued intention to support DIP.<ref>http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/publications/alcohol-drugs/drugs/drug-strategy/drug-strategy-2010?view=Binary</ref>.

==Overview==

The Drug Interventions Programme (DIP) is the UK's main Criminal Justice initiative aimed at engaging substance misusing offenders in drug treatment. It does this through a variety of methods, some [[coercive]], such as the Tough Choices program, and some relying on voluntary engagement. Class A drug-misusing offenders are identified on their journey through the CJS and steered towards treatment and wraparound support. Key points of intervention include following a positive drugs test in police custody, and following release from prison.

DIP's key partners include [[police]], the probation service, prisons, courts and other criminal justice agencies, as well as the [[National Treatment Agency for Substance Misuse|National Treatment Agency]] and the [[Department of Health (United Kingdom)|Department of Health]].<ref>{{cite web

| last =

| first =

Line 51:

| url =http://www.drugs.gov.uk/drug-interventions-programme/strategy/partner-roles/ | format =

| doi =

| accessdate = }}</ref>. It is hard to discern the precise cost of DIP. Whilst DIP Key Messages (of February 2009) identified that 'over £600 million has been invested in DIP,' ,<ref>{{cite web

| last =

| first =

Line 63:

| format =

| doi =

| accessdate = }}</ref>, DIP's Operational Handbook (also 2009) put the figure at 'over £900m'.<ref>{{cite web

| last = Home Office

| first =

Line 71:

| work =

| publisher = Home Office

| dateyear = 2009

| url =http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/publications/crime/reducing-reoffending/DIP-Operational-Handbook?view=Binary

| format = pdf

| doi =

| accessdate = 30th30 July 2011 }}</ref>.

Some evidence has been taken to suggest that DIP has been effective in achieving its aims, though a serious shortfall in methodologically rigorous evaluations makes such claims problematic. Nonetheless, in his foreword to the 2008 Drug Strategy the Home Secretary claimed that DIP coercion and case management have 'contributed to a fall in recorded acquisitive crime of around 20 per cent'.<ref>{{cite web

| last = Home Office

| first =

Line 85:

| work =

| publisher = Home Office

| dateyear = 2008

| url = http://www.erpho.org.uk/Download/Public/8340/1/national-drug-strategy-2008.pdf

| format = pdf

| doi =

| accessdate = 30th30 July 2011 }}</ref>. A short while later, DIP Key Messages made rather grander claims: 'since 2003, acquisitive crime (which is strongly associated with class A substance misuse) has fallen by 32 per cent in England and Wales.{{FactCitation needed|reason=Reference needed, and measure - convictions? British Crime Survey?|date=September 2011}}

==Tough Choices==

Line 107:

==Prolific and Other Priority Offenders Scheme and DIP==

In 2004, the Prolific and Other Priority Offenders (PPO) Scheme was set up. A crime reduction initiative, it aims to identify a hard-core of individuals considered responsible for large amounts of crime, and manage them through either rehabilitation or conviction. There are currently 10,000 offenders in the UK who are involved in the PPO scheme, a significant proportion of whom have drug dependency issues. The [[Home Office]] encourages DIPs and PPO schemes to work closely together in such cases to ensure effective case management of offenders.<ref>{{cite web

| last =

| first =

Line 118:

| url =http://www.crimereduction.gov.uk/ppo/Key_Messages_PPO_MAY_07.doc | format = Word Document

| doi =

| accessdate = }}</ref>.

==Controversy==

[[Release (agency)|Release]], a UK charity which advises professionals and the public on criminal justice and drugs matters, strongly opposed the Test-on-Arrest and Required Assessment measures brought in by the Drugs Act 2005. They stated that mandatory drug testing was possibly in contravention with Article 8 of the Human Rights Act 1998, and that the possibility of false positives could lead to mandatory assessments for non-drug using Detained Prisoners. They also queried the Required Assessment process, calling into question the ethics and efficacy of coerced addiction treatment, and highlighting the possible re-direction of resources away from the voluntary treatment sector.<ref>{{cite web

| last =

| first =

Line 133:

| format = pdf

| doi =

| accessdate = }}</ref>.

==See also==