Content deleted Content added
→Recent reversions: new section |
→Recent reversions: :Agree, that while potentially "true", without actual reliable third party sources to support the "facts", it is just WP:OR. ~~~~ |
||
Line 64:
I have just undone an unsourced paragraph from another user who appears to have a potential conflict of interest related to Inview. I have also announced my own potential conflict of interest (related to AT&T) so I don't mean to step on any toes. However, I was following up on another editor (TheRedPenOfDoom) who performed similar reversions. At a minimum, content that states opinions about the difficulty of use or proper solution for EPG remote problems should be [[WP:V|sourced]]. When that is resolved we can talk about whether the proposed edits slant too much in any direction. Thank you for your understanding. [[Special:Contributions/12.153.112.21|12.153.112.21]] ([[User talk:12.153.112.21|talk]]) 17:39, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
:Agree, that while potentially "true", without actual reliable third party sources to support the "facts", it is just [[WP:OR]]. -- [[User talk:TheRedPenOfDoom|<span style="color:red;;;">TRPoD <small>aka The Red Pen of Doom</small></span>]] 18:01, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
| |||