Revision as of 18:00, 7 May 2006 edit PJTraill (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 1,977 edits →Procedural vs. Declarative: "Procedural" ambiguous, I said so. ← Previous edit		Revision as of 18:05, 7 May 2006 edit undo PJTraill (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 1,977 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 1: == "Procedural" v. "Imperative" (merge?) == Why does this article include this tag? This article should be merged with imperative programming. Line 8 ⟶ 10: :::I can't pretend that I fully understand the definition either, but it would appear that procedural programming describes something which is so embedded in programming styles that it's taken for granted. Imperative languages divide their code up into files (C), or classes (C++, Java); some functional languages divide the code up into modules (Haskell, SML) and classes (OCaml) for the same reason. I assume logic programming languages do something very similar. Surely only the very simplest programs written nowadays are in the form of one monolithic main() method! :) [[User:129.215.13.84\|129.215.13.84]] 28 June 2005 16:49 (UTC) : [[User:PJTraill\|PJTraill]] 18:05, 7 May 2006 (UTC) See my comment under Procedural v. Declarative (18:00, 7 May 2006) ==Rewrite==

Talk:Procedural programming: Difference between revisions