Content deleted Content added
→Further reading section is bloated: reason for another removal |
|||
Line 34:
== Further reading section is bloated ==
The further reading section should be trimmed down. Alternatively, some headings /
:I agree. [[Wikipedia:Further reading|Further reading]] is [[Wikipedia:Further reading#Limited|not a list of all books]] covering the subject. Books in further reading should be notable for their quality, reliability, etc and should be about the subject of the article. Some of the books that are listed, like "Orthogonal Transforms for Digital Signal Processing" and that new addition that keeps getting re-added, are really too specific to be listed on this page, which is about DSP in general. [[User:Radiodef|Radiodef]] ([[User talk:Radiodef|talk]]) 17:44, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
Line 53:
:[[User:Radiodef|Radiodef]] ([[User talk:Radiodef|talk]]) 19:47, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
:: Yes, the section should focus on general texts. It may be OK to add some narrow/specific ones, but then there should be a short comment about why that text is useful. I recognize the Embree ref, but I don't recall its quality or breadth. Oppenheim is a classic (4.3 stars on Amazon). I'm not familiar with them, but Lyons (4.6 stars on Amazon) and Proakis are often cited; McClelland and Shaefer are names in the field. CRC Press often puts out huge encyclopedias about an area; the CRC for DSP might be good, but the radar/sonar/medical imaging might be too far afield. The Doug Smith / ARRL book has no reviews on Amazon.
:: I encourage editors to add comments for good entries and delete weak entries.
:: [[User:Glrx|Glrx]] ([[User talk:Glrx|talk]]) 19:15, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
| |||